Approaches of Comparative Politics
There are a variety of approaches to comparative politics, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Some of the most common approaches include:
Traditional Approach
The traditional approach to comparative politics is based on the study of formal political institutions. This includes legislatures, executives, and judiciaries. This approach focuses on the structure and functions of these institutions. It also deals with the relationships between them.
Behavioral Approach
The behavioral approach to comparative politics emerged in the mid-20th century. It emerged as a reaction to the traditional approach. Behaviorists argue that the study of formal institutions is not enough to understand how political systems actually work. They focus on the behavior of political actors, such as voters, parties, and interest groups.
Structural Approach
The structural approach to comparative politics focuses on the broader social, economic, and international forces that shape political systems. Structuralists argue that these forces play a key role in determining:
- the distribution of power and
- the outcomes of political processes.
Cultural Approach
The cultural approach to comparative politics focuses on the role of culture in shaping political systems and processes. Culturalists argue that cultural values and norms play an important role in determining:
- how people think about politics and
- how they take part in political life.
Rational Choice Approach
The rational choice approach to comparative politics is based on the assumption that political actors are rational actors. They make decisions based on their own self-interest. Rational choice theorists use game theory and other economic models to study political behavior.
Learn more about organisational power and politics!
